(My subjective ratings, indicated by ticks after the article,
should not be taken too seriously.
If you disagree, let me know and
if your argument is rational, I'll append your view).
A red E indicates an editorial, a question mark that we
declined to rate the study!
R indicates a review
A dobutamine test can disclose hepatosplanchnic hypoperfusion in
septic patients
AJRCCM 1999 160 839-5.
n=36, non-randomised, 'own controls'. 28M 8F. Patients were on dopamine
mean 6.6 µg/kg/min. PAC. PAc, gastric tonometry. {How was BSA calculated?}.
Hepatosplanchnic blood flow (HSBF) by ICG infusion. Monitoring of suprahepatic SvO2
(difference between this and mixed venous sat labelled 'DSvhO2').
With dobutamine 5 and 10 µ/kg/min, CI increased from 3.2 to 4.1 to 4.6 l/min/m 2 ;
HSBF from 0.59 to 0.77 to 0.82; and PCO2gap dropped from 10.8 to 7.0 to 7.4;
A decrease in PCO2gap over 5mmHg at 10µg/kg/min was considered positive
(n=12); if positive then DSvhO2 was greater (27% vs 9%) and HSBF/CI was
< 20%. Positive dobutamine test predicted DSvhO2 above 20% with sensitivity
of 83%, specificity 96%. {they do many sub-analyses}.
Quote
Fink (CCM 1991 19 627-41) and
Mythen (ICM 1994 20 203-9) to
support 'gut motor' hypothesis for sepsis. Quote Gutierrez (AJRCCM 1994 150 324-9),
Marik (Chest 1993 104 225-9) and Maynard &c (JAMA 1993 270 1203-0) to
support regional hypoperfusion in presence of adequate global haemodynamics.
Use of pHi monitoring to guide therapy (
Gutierrez Lancet 1992 339 195-9).
Quote
Levy (ICM 1997 23 282-7) that epinephrine decreases splanchnic perfusion.
How did the patients do?
Is it time to abandon the pHi concept?
Int J Int Care 1998 16-21. ('Spring' : ? Vol number)
Review
Cites Russell (ICM 1997 23 3-6) on questionable validity of pHi, as well as Boyd (Lancet 1993 341 142-6) and Benjamin (Crit Care Clin 1996 12 587-01;
CCM 1993 21S S257); see also Benjamin (CCM 1992 20 1181-3).
A good review of how pHi is meant to work {of course completely ignoring
the Stewart approach to acid-base}.
Studies relating pHi to survival include Gutierrez (Lancet 1992 339
195-9; CCM 1992 20 451-7),
Doglio (CCM 1991 19 1037-0), Ensinger (Anasthesiol Intensivmed
Notfallmed Schmerzther 1996 31 132-2),
Chang (Arch Surg 1996 131 728-1;
J Trauma 1997 42 577-4); See also Chang (J Trauma 1994 37 488-4) and Joynt (Anaesthesia 1997 52 726-2). Cites Meier-Hellman (CCM 1997 25 399-3)
and Levy (ICM 1997 23 282-7) on epinephrine v norepinephrine + dobutamine.
Notes the contrasting studies of Meier-Hellman (ICM 1996 22 1354-9) and
Ljunghdi (Shock 1997 7 131-8) that show lack of correlation between intestinal
blood flow and pHi or intestinal lactate production. Much speculation.
.
Epinephrine impairs splanchnic perfusion in septic shock.
CCM 1997 25.3 399-4.
n=8 patients with septic shock; crossover: epinephrine vs dobutamine + norEpi;
no paralysis; PAC; ICG; Hb kept to 11g/dl; fluid optimised (HES) to LV stroke
work (!); Paired data compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sign.
5/8 died. MAP 89 +- 12 / 86 +- 14 (dobut+norepinephrine / Epi); PAOP 17 / 18;
CI 5.9 / 5.9; SVR 552 / 561; DO2 and VO2 were also similar;
Splanchnic blood flow was 2.8 +- 1.4 l/min/m 2 for Dobut+norepinephrine v
1.6 +- 0.6 for Epi! Splanchnic DO2 and VO2 were lower in the epinephrine group.
Lactate levels were higher and pHi was lower in the epinephrine group.
Note that Mackenzie &c (ICM 1991 17 36-9) support use of adrenaline;
likewise Moran (CCM 1993 21 70-7). Contrast this with lowered splanchnic
flow in normal sheep (
Bersten CCM 1994 22 994-1) and visceral blood pooling
(ref 10) induced by adrenaline;
Breslow (AJP 1987 252 H291-0) supports
similar effects in pig sepsis. Splanchnic flow is up in human sepsis
according to Fong (JCI 1990 85 1896-4) but demand is said to be even
greater (Dahn Surg 1987 101 69-80).
See also animal studies summarised by Kvietys (AJP 1982 243 G1-9), and note Antonsson (AJP 1990 259 G519-3) on correlation between pHi and
needle electrode.
See Nelson (JAP 1988 64 2410-9) and Cain (ref 35) in support of
both global and regional supply dependency in sepsis.
The major problem with this apparently well-designed and well-argued
study is its tiny size . In addition, the high lactate levels
seen with adrenaline infusion are not necessarily harmful.
.
Date of First Publication: 1999 | Date of Last Update: 2006/10/24 | Web page author: Click here |