Double lumen tubes & airway rupture

Journal Reviewed:  Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia
Issues: June 1999: Volume 13: Number 3
Abstracted by: Dr M J Akhtar  MB BCh (Registrar, University of the Witwatersrand)

Summary of abstracts

One should always be aware of potentially devastating consequences of anaesthetic interventions, even if such disasters are uncommon. Today we briefly explore airway rupture in the setting of double lumen tube placement, and then conclude with a rare aside. You may also wish to briefly browse our editorial comment


1.  Airway rupture from double-lumen tubes.

The actual incidence of airway rupture has probably been under-reported. Red rubber tube material is more rigid.  Re-sterilised red rubber tubes have irregularities of the tube tip and are more often associated with airway damage, especially when inserted forcefully during the intubation process. A carinal hook if present can also injure the upper airway. When the poly-vinyl-chloride double lumen tubes were introduced in 1980 it was believed that these tubes did not cause airway injuries.  Reports of airway injury from the poly-vinyl-chloride double lumen tubes soon appeared however. In this article the risk factors for airway rupture with double lumen tubes, complications of double lumen lube usage and the recommendations for double lumen tube placement are discussed concisely. The medical literature published between 1972- 1998 was reviewed and where possible the foreign language publications were translated into English and one of the original investigators was contacted for additional information.

Initial over-inflation of either the tracheal or bronchial cuff at the time of tube placement may have accounted for the greatest number of injuries with red rubber double lumen tubes as well as with poly-vinyl-chloride double lumen tubes. Movement of the patient into the lateral decubitus position with both cuffs inflated increases the chances of mucosal trauma.  Red rubber double lumen tubes have low volume/ high pressure cuffs and inflate asymmetrically after multiple uses and are associated with more frequent airway injuries.

In the case of poly-vinyl-chloride double lumen tubes manufacturers recommend the removal of the stylet of the bronchial lumen as soon as the tip of the tube has passed the vocal cords.  Actually the stylet have never been implicated in any report of major airway injury. There is one report that recommends retaining of the stylet throughout the process of the tube placement.

Large and medium size red rubber double lumen tubes were associated with most of the airway injuries reported. In contrast the majority of the airway injuries with the poly-vinyl-chloride double lumen tubes are associated with the small size tubes.

Although airway injuries have been reported with all types of pulmonary surgery with both red rubber double lumen tubes as well as with poly-vinyl-chloride double lumen tubes, the most frequently reported surgery associated with such injuries is oesophageal surgery.

Risk Factors for the Airway Rupture

Direct trauma
  • "Too forceful an insertion"
  • Frayed tube tip [red rubber double lumen tubes only]
  • Tube too large for the bronchus.
  • Tube advanced with the stylet in place (Questionable)
  • Movement of the tube while both cuffs are inflated.
  • Carinal hook damage.
Cuff over-inflation
  • Too rapid an inflation.
  • Too large a volume. (Small tube require larger volumes to achieve a seal.)
  • Nitrous oxide distention.
  • Asymmetric cuff distention pushing the tube tip into the airway wall
    [red rubber double lumen tubes predominantly ]
Pre-existing airway pathology
  • Congenital airway wall abnormalities
  • Airway wall weakness from tumor infiltration or infection.
  • Airway distortion from mediastinal lymph nodes or associated tumor.
  • Patients receiving steroids or suffering from leukemia or lymphoma.
  • Hypotension with hypoperfusion to the airway.

Airway damage can present with an air leak causing subcutaneous emphysema or cardiovascular instability from a tension pneumothorax.   Airway hemorrhage and aneurysmal dilation of the membranous wall can occur from incomplete laceration of the airway with dissection of the adventitia. The signs of injury may be delayed.

Bronchoscopy performed before extubation allows early diagnosis in the cases where airway injury is suspected as immediate surgical intervention is essential for favorable results.

Fitzmaurice and Brodsky's recommendations for the safe placement of a double lumen tube

  1. Choose the largest poly-vinyl-chloride double lumen tube that will safely fit the patient’s airway.
  2. Remove the bronchial stylet once the tip of the tube is past the vocal cords.
  3. Be extra cautious with patients who have tracheo-bronchial wall pathological disease, leukemia, steroid therapy or  hypoperfusion.
  4. Advance the double lumen tube to the appropriate distance in the bronchus (based on the patient height)
  5. Inflate both cuffs slowly.
  6. Use 3ml syringe to inflate the bronchial cuff.
  7. Never over-inflate either cuff. 
    (Usually <3mls of air is adequate for the bronchial cuff if an appropriate size double lumen tube is selected.  If more air is needed, reassess the tube size and position.)
  8. When nitrous oxide is used consider inflating both cuffs with saline or an oxygen/nitrous oxide mixture.
  9. When nitrous oxide is used measure the cuff pressures intermittently. Keep the bronchial cuff pressure < 30cm of water
  10. Deflate both cuffs before moving the patient
  11. Deflate the bronchial cuff when lung isolation is not required.
  12. During oesophageal surgery consider partial deflation of the cuff when surgical dissection is near either cuff.
  13. Test the integrity of the intubated bronchus at the completion of surgery.
  14. Use a fiberoptic bronchoscope to determine the extent of any suspected injury.
Article 1: Airway rupture from double-lumen tubes
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, Vol 15, No 3, 1999: 322-329
Article type:  Literature Review
Authors:  Fitzmaurice, B.  Brodsky, J.

2.  Selecting the correct size left double-lumen tube

It is important to select the correct size of double lumen tube because most of the complications associated with double lumen tubes results from selecting too small a tube. Small double lumen tubes are more easily displaced as compared to large double lumen tubes, causing obstruction of the orifice to the upper lobe. Other problems include the over-inflation of the bronchial cuff in order to get a good seal.  Overinflation can cause herniation of the cuff in to the carina as well as airway rupture. Increased resistance to airflow during one lung ventilation with small double lumen tubes can be another problem.

Appropriate size double lumen tube selection has been done by different methods.

  • Width of the left main bronchus from the chest radiograph. (Only visible in 50% of cases)
  • Left bronchial diameter measured by the chest computed tomograph (CT).

The width of the trachea measured from the postero-anterior chest radiograph can be used to predict the left bronchial size and can be very helpful in selecting the appropriate size of double lumen tube quite accurately.

Jay B Brodsky et al. applied this method of selection of double lumen tube on 487 patients.  All patients were intubated successfully, the tubes functioned properly and there were no complications.

Hannallah et al by using CT scans for choosing the appropriate size double lumen tube found that in 75% of their patients they used a smaller size double lumen tube (37 or 35 French) as compared to the Brodsky series, where only 3% required a 37 or a 35 french double lumen tube

Guidelines for choosing a left double lumen tube.

Measured tracheal width (mm)

Predicted left bronchus width (mm)

Double lumen tube Size

Outer Diameter (mm)

Main Body Left Lumen
greater than 18 greater than 12.2 41-Fr 14-15 10.6
16.1 to 18 10.9-12.1 39-Fr 13-14 10.1
15.1 to 16 10.2-10.8 37-Fr 13-14 10.0
less than 15 9.5-10.1 35-Fr 12-13 9.5

NOTE. Tracheal width (mm) as measured from the chest radiograph.
Predicted  left bronchus width (mm) is 68% of the measured tracheal width.

Double lumen tubes of 35 french size are seldom required for adult patients unless they have very small airways, but they can be used for larger children. Mallinckrodt also offers 32-French double lumen tube.  The author has used a 32-French BroncoCath double lumen tube in three 10 year old children with excellent results.

Article 2: Selecting the correct size left double-lumen tube
Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Vol 11, No 7, 1997: 924-925.
Article type:  Letter to the editor
Authors: Brodsky JB, Mackey S, Cannon WB.


3.  An Oddity

Finally, we draw your attention to another letter from Prof. Brodsky, this about the exotic problem of inserting a double lumen tube into somebody with situs inversus, where the lung, heart and abdominal anatomy is a mirror image of normal. The solution is obvious - put a left double lumen tube down the right side!

Article 3: Choice of Double-Lumen Tube in Kartagener's Syndrome.
Journal: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia 11 (6) 1997 810
Article type: Letter
Authors: Habibi A, Brodsky JB.

 

Editorial pointers

 

The article on airway rupture by Fitzmaurice and Brodsky is comprehensive, authoritative and well worth reading in full. The authors clearly have a vast experience of double lumen tube placement, and have researched the topic in detail. The central theme, returned to again and again, is that mismatch between cuff inflation and bronchial size is the main contributor to injuries induced by double-lumen tubes, be they red rubber or polyvinyl chloride. The tables reproduced above list other factor that contribute to airway rupture, and more importantly a comprehensive strategy for avoiding this anaesthetic catastrophe.

We recently had the pleasure of a brief visit from Prof Brodsky, whose comments on double lumen tubes were most enlightening. His take home message was that one should select the largest tube , for several reasons: it is more difficult to advance such a tube too far, the greater diameter lowers resistance and auto-PEEP, and because of the tighter fit, there is less air in the cuff and less fiddling with the airway while trying to achive a snug seal! Professor Brodsky's second communication addresses the issue of determining the largest tube size. Fortunately, the diameter of the left main bronchus is easily and reliably predicted as 68% of the tracheal diameter measured off a PA chest x-ray. Likewise, depth of placement of the tube should be dictated by the patient's height, as there is a linear relationship between ideal depth of placement and patient height. Simply shoving the double lumen tube in until it doesn't go any further is now unacceptable. Note that patient size does not necessarily correlate well with bronchial diameter, for example one sometimes encounters a small woman with chronic obstructive airway disease who has enormous airways!

(We note parenthetically that the above refers of course to left double lumen tubes. The rare placement of right DLTs is today limited to situations where there is obstruction of the left main bronchus, a left broncho-pleural fistula, unilateral (left) one lung transplant, and sleeve resection of the left main bronchus. Note that Campos and colleagues disagree! They have recently reported a series of patients (Anesth Analg 2000 Mar;90(3):535-40) where modified left or right Mallinckrodt BronchoCaths were compared for left-sided thoracic surgery. They found no difference between the two as regards malpositions, number of fibreoptic bronchoscopic examinations, time for adequacy of left lung collapse, or incidence right upper lobe collapse. They did however note that right-sided tubes cost more and placement took longer. Less than convincing protagonists of an increasingly outmoded practice).

Ed

   

Old scopes logo
Up