Several recent editorials and articles from the 'ICU literature' have
recently propogated the concept of 'Splanchnic Resuscitation', and
especially the use of agents like dobutamine in 'resuscitating the
splanchnic circulation'. This webpage briefly examines the controversies.
Dobutamine - Back to BasicsDobutamine is a synthetic catecholamine that has been in clinical use for over twenty years. Surprisingly, most people who use it are ignorant of its basic pharmacology. Here is a picture of the dobutamine molecule:
As can be seen from the above picture, dobutamine has an asymmetric carbon atom, and can therefore exist as two enantiomers, (-)dobutamine and (+)dobutamine. Clinically used solutions are racemic - a mixture of the two. Dobutamine pharmacodynamicsTraditionally, dobutamine has been regarded as a fairly selective adrenergic beta-1 agonist. This is far from the truth. Dobutamine does indeed have excellent beta-1 agonist activity, and a small beta-2 effect, but this is less than half of the story! Dobutamine appears not to have activity at or affinity for dopaminergic receptors, but has complex effects at alpha-adrenergic receptors. The glib, conventional assumption has been that because (-)dobutamine has alpha agonist activity, and (+)dobutamine acts as an alpha blocker, the two effects more-or less cancel one another out in the racemic mixture. This is unlikely to be true. The alpha adrenergic effects of dobutamine racemate were studied by Kenakin in 1980 [J Pharm Exp Ther 1981 216(2) 210-9]. He found that the racemic mixture was a partial alpha agonist, with a receptor affinity twenty-five times that of noradrenaline (pK A 7.7 vs 6.3), but just over half the efficacy of noradrenaline. Dobutamine antagonises the alpha effect of noradrenaline. (Of interest is that in this study, concentrations of dobutamine required to exert an effect on the beta receptors of rabbit aorta were one thousand times as great as those exerting an alpha effect). Unfortunately, Kenakin then rhapsodises at length about the possible 'non-beta-1 selective' nature of dobutamine, which rather dilutes the impact of his study. A somewhat better study is that of Ruffolo et al [J Pharm Exp Ther 1981 219 447-52]. These authors looked not only at the racemate, but also the individual stereoisomers. They found that the racemate and (-)dobutamine are potent partial alpha agonists (in agreement with Kenaki's study). (+)dobutamine has about seven times as much beta-1 effect as (-)dobutamine, but is nearly devoid of alpha agonist activity. (+)dobutamine nevertheless has affinity for the alpha receptor that is almost identical to that of (-)dobutamine. In summary, the dobutamine racemate we use clinically has partial alpha agonist effects. In clinical circumstances where there is marked activation of the sympathetic nervous system, or alpha agonists are used, we can expect dobutamine to antagonise these effects! Even more intriguing are the effects of dobutamine at the beta-2 receptor. MacGregor et al [Chest 1996 109 194-200] demonstrate convincingly the weak agonist effect of dobutamine at beta-2 receptors compared with full agonists like adrenaline and isoprenaline {although they seem a little confused in that they describe dobutamine as having 'primarily beta-2 adrenergic agonist properties'}. A follow-up article is more exciting [Prielipp R. et al, Anesthesiology 1998 89 49-57]. Here they demonstrate convincingly that both in vitro (lymphocytes) and in vivo (cardiac inotropy), dobutamine competitively antagonised the beta-2 agonist effect of adrenaline! In other words, dobutamine is also a partial agonist at the beta -2 receptor, with about ten times less intrinsic activity at the beta-2 receptor than adrenaline. The last study suggests that we should be very careful if we use dobutamine in combination with other beta agonists such as adrenaline. Dobutamine pharmacokineticsAs with pharmacodynamics, there is widespread misunderstanding of dobutamine pharmacokinetics. Dobutamine is always given as a continuous infusion, usually in the range of 5 to 20 µg/kg/min, although rates of up to 200 µg/kg/min have been used by some. Onset of effect is rapid, and removal from the circulation equally brisk (half-life in patients in heart failure reported as being about 2.4 minutes) [Leier C & Unverferth DV, Ann Int Med 1983 99 490-6]. Removal is by the liver. Metabolism is mainly by catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) to 3-O-methyldobutamine, with subsequent conjugation to glucuronic acid, and excretion in the urine. (Some dobutamine is excreted as dobutamine glucuronide). Both major metabolites are pharmacologically inactive. Vast amounts of dobutamine have been used in critically ill patients in recent years. Users should all read the paper by Klem et al entitled Variability in dobutamine pharmacokinetics in unstable critically ill surgical patients [Crit Care Med 1994 22(12) 1926-32]. Clearance of dobutamine from the circulation was first-order. An enormous variation in dobutamine levels was noted at similar infusion rates! For example, at 5 µg/kg/min, serum concentrations of the drug ranged from 25 to 350 ng/mL, a fourteen-fold variation. In addition, clearance changed substantially with time in individual patients. We have redrawn their Fig. 3 to highlight this effect:
Such variation is not that surprising if one considers the hepatic metabolism of the drug, and that even in normal individuals there is from person to person a five-fold variation in hepatic COMT content. We also can explain clinical studies where titrating dobutamine dose to effect has necessitated infusion rates up to 200 µg/kg/min. Dobutamine has substantial extra-cardiac effects. This was ably demonstrated in a study by Karzai and colleagues [Brit J Anaesth 1996 76 5-8]. The authors measured oxygen delivery and consumption in patients on cardiac bypass, thus excluding the heart from consideration. A worrying finding was the increase in oxygen consumption seen without any change in oxygen delivery. This implies that dobutamine may stimulate peripheral tissues into increased metabolism, of great concern to those using the drug on critically patients. It is thought that after more than 72 hours of dobutamine usage, tolerance occurs to the effects of the drug. This may be due to beta receptor down-regulation. Clinical use of dobutamineDobutamine is a valuable agent in clinical medicine. It has a well-established role in the following circumstances:
The role of dobutamine in other circumstances is less well-defined. In the 1990's, when 'supra-normalisation' of critically ill patients was in vogue, dobutamine was used to achieve 'supra-normal' cardiac outputs. Enthusiasm for this aggressive therapy appears largely to have waned, although certain individuals still espouse similar practices in, for example, selected patients pre-operatively! There is evidence that use of dobutamine to boost cardiac output may increase mortality [Hayes MA et al. NEJM 1994 330 1717]. Recently we have seen something of a resurgence of interest in dobutamine
administration in critically ill patients for the purposes of 'splanchnic
resuscitation'. We will explore this phenomenon.
See for example the editorial by Kumar [Crit Care Med 1997 25(8) 1266-7], and that by Marshall. We need to look at each of the above assertions in turn. But first let us decide how we are going to assess the effects of vasoactive drugs on the splanchnic circulation. Defining the splanchnic effects of vasoactive agentsAs Kvietys and Granger [Am J Physiol 1982 243 G1-9] pointed out in a fine editorial review, assessment of the effect of vasoactive agents on splanchnic oxygen uptake is difficult. For example, in various preparations, adrenaline has been shown to vasoconstrict and either decrease, increase or have no effect on intestinal oxygen uptake! Part of the reason for this confusion may be that in some circumstances splanchnic metabolism may depend markedly on flow (This is not the normal case, apart perhaps from hepatic metabolism. In several studies, wide variations in intestinal, stomach and pancreatic flow have resulted in tiny changes in oxygen consumption). Bowel distension or baseline hypoperfusion of the gut will result in aberrant results! Kvietys and Granger recommend the following approach to minimise the confusion that then prevailed in the various studies:
Clinical assessment of splanchnic perfusionA variety of techniques have been used to assess splanchnic perfusion in critically ill patients. Clearly, the gold-standard - implantation of electromagnetic flow-meters around the vessels in question - is out, so other methods must be sought. These include:
Unfortunately, all of the above are far from perfect. The meaning and value of pHi have been called into question repeatedly. Contrast editorials by Fink [Chest 1998 114 667-70] 'Tissue capnometry as a monitoring strategy for critically ill patients - just about ready for prime time ' with a review by Brinkert [Int J. Intensive Care spring 1998 16-21] 'Is it time to abandon the pHi concept?'. ICG clearance has its limitations, and laser doppler flowmetry generally assess only a tiny portion of the mucosa - in addition, changes in (for example) the stomach may not mirror what is happening more distally, especially in the colon, a vast reservoir of bacteria. All clinical studies should be seen in the light of the limited methods we have for assessing splanchnic perfusion. An interesting idea is to look at splanchnic function rather than perfusion. A gross clinical measure is simply whether the intestine is tolerating feeds. (More experimental measures include exotic tests like the use of superconducting quantum interference devices {SQUIDs !} to measure the magnetic field generated by electrical activity in the bowel, a sensitive index of bowel ischaemia). Animal studiesA variety of animal models have been used to assess the effects of inotropic agents such as dobutamine on the bowel. Results in 'septic' animals have often differed from those acquired in the non-septic state. 'Non-septic' animals
Septic animals
Clinical studiesThe above studies don't help very much. What about studies in the critically ill, notably patients with 'severe sepsis'? There are several issues, including the existence of impaired splanchnic perfusion in such patients, whether this actually does predispose to multiple organ dysfunction, and the effects of dobutamine on impaired splanchnic perfusion. Let's ask the questions: Do critically ill patients have impaired splanchnic perfusion?Great disparity exists in the literature between various studies that have tried to quantitate hepatosplanchnic blood flow in critically ill (especially septic) patients. For example:
Other reported values have been 0.59 l/min/m 2 in patients on dopamine infusions (Creteur); 0.87 l/min/m 2 , but with values up to 4.7l/min/m 2 (De Backer); and 0.91 +- 0.21 l/min/m 2 (Reinelt). There is clearly great variation in hepatosplanchnic blood flow in different patients, suggesting that the population is heterogenous. This should serve as a caution against treating all 'septic' patients in the same fashion. Does impaired splanchnic perfusion predispose to MOF?Several studies have documented the association between low pHi and poor outcome in ICU. For example:
Other studies attesting to the value of pHi include those of Fiddian-Green [Crit Care Med 1987 15 153-6], Gys [Crit Care Med 1988 16 1222-4], Dogilio [Crit Care Med 1991 19 1037-40], Gutierrez [Crit Care Med 1992 20 451-7], Maynard [JAMA 1993 270 1203-10], Marik [Chest 1993 104 225-9], and Trinder [Anaesth Int Care 1995 23 315-21]. Controversy still exists over whether the low pHi reflects localised hypoperfusion, or is symptomatic of systemic acidosis (with which it is often associated). Others have put forward the PCO2 gap (mucosal-arterial carbon dioxide tension) as a better measure of regional hypoperfusion. Recent evidence [Kellum, Crit Care Med 2000, 28 462-466] shows that this is not the case - for detection of a 50% drop in the portal flow of septic dogs, a 20 mmHg gap had a maximum accuracy of 67%, for example. Lactate release by the gut is similarly poorly predicted. Does dobutamine improve splanchnic perfusion, and if so, in what doses?Many small studies claim that dobutamine improves splanchnic perfusion. Others show little or no benefit. Here are some of these studies:
In summary, there is no clear evidence that dobutamine has a consistent, beneficial effect on splanchnic perfusion in critically ill septic patients. Most studies that try to investigate such effects are small, and many are flawed. In many studies, fixed doses of 5-10 µg/kg/min of dobutamine were given; in others, administration was titrated to effect. In the single large study where 'splanchnic resuscitation' efforts were titrated against pHi, no benefit accrued. Does dobutamine administration lower the incidence of MOF?This is the million dollar question. Large well-designed studies are needed - the only study we are aware of that approximates these requirements, that of Gomersall et al, showed no benfit, with similar ICU and hospital mortalities in the two groups. ConclusionDobutamine is an agent with complex actions. From basic studies of its pharmacology, we expect pronounced beta-1 effects, minimal beta-2 agonist activity (with the potential for beta-2 antagonism), and some alpha adrenergic agonist activity (with the potential for profound alpha-adrenergic antagonism in hyper-adrenergic states). Elimination of the drug is highly variable both in and between individuals - dose should probably therefore be titrated to effect, something which has not been done in many studies. Critically ill patients constitute a heterogeneous population. There is no consistent evidence that overall hepatosplanchnic flow is consistently low in such patients, in fact, this flow may be increased in many critically ill patients with sepsis. Mucosal blood flow need not necessarily correlate with total bowel blood flow, and imbalances in flow may be exacerbated by adrenergic agents with alpha agonist activity. There is no clear and consistent evidence that dobutamine (or any other agent) has a beneficial effect on hepatosplanchnic blood flow or intestinal mucosal flow, although some studies suggest this. More important is the current lack of evidence that administration of dobutamine has a beneficial effect on outcome. Some studies where dobutamine was titrated to effect in critically ill patients suggest that administration of the drug may be deleterious. There is every reason not to add 'low-dose dobutamine' to management of the critically ill until convincing benefits are shown in decent-sized studies. It is unclear (given the wide variation in blood dobutamine levels at a given infusion rate) how such administration would be titrated to effect. The use of pHi seems questionable in this regard. Based on our current knowledge, routine administration of a fixed dose of dobutamine to critically ill patients with impaired hepatosplanchnic blood flow would appear extremely ill-advised. ReferencesWe have appended a list of relevant references including brief informal reviews of the articles, as a separate file.
|